It is rather interesting that while types of usability testing have been around for more than two decades, it is still covered in various misconceptions and myths. Throughout the years’ usability testing methods, an essential part of software development has turned out to be significantly less difficult, speedier and less expensive – there are extremely no justifiable reasons to NOT do usability testing process.
At the beginning of the internet, before Google move toward becoming ruler and there was as yet a wild-west feel to the advanced world, types of usability testing was a lot harder than it is now. Information was similarly as frequently accumulated physically as carefully, which means you needed to physically discover clients, record their actions question them and after that make conclusions. Analytics and data weren’t as incorporated or available, which means you couldn’t easily pick up or show information.
This drawn-out process implied that some loco myths created around usability testing in software testing. Presently, when you consider “myths” you most likely consider old, false yet part of the structure holding the system together.
Usability testing myths are somewhat similar to that: they originate from a period while everything digital was more troublesome, less incorporated, and there were numerous difficulties as far as gaining pertinent information. For any business that didn’t have loads of extra money, usability testing was a puzzling, semi-legendary process.
Regardless, it’s regularly led with poor or unsystematic approach thus doesn’t generally satisfy to its full potential. Accordingly, here are some myths and Misconceptions about usability testing strategy that gives locate a chance to out if there is some helpful truth to them.
Myth 1: You require a usability lab or potentially costly equipment
This was genuine 20 years prior when you expected to employ a lab with two-way mirrors and video recording suite that resembled something from Nasa’s Cape Canaveral.
Ten years ago even a ‘lab in a pack’ cost a few thousand pounds/dollars and you expected to drag a big camera around.
Nowadays with the broadband web, low-cost great quality webcams, coordinate screen recorders, this is not true anymore. Remote usability testing by a client sitting at home is presently possible.
Myth 2: It’s All About the Metrics
A few people believe that usability testing approach is tied in with estimating the usability of a UI and collecting usability testing metrics such as user-satisfaction ratings, task-completion rates, error rates, and time on task.
But, the metrics aren’t as critical as they are valuable in comparative and summative usability testing, with countless participants. The motivation behind these tests is to survey the usability of a final software product, benchmark a UI, or look at least two UIs.
Myth 3: Usability Testing must be done when the development/ design is finished
Again, not reality! It is fundamental to assemble client input and incorporate it into the development system ideal from the word ‘go’ with the goal that the design can be changed by feedback. While some might not have any desire to actualize types of usability testing at all phases of development, it succeeds to motivate clients to test fundamental things like the menu, wireframes or prototypes in the underlying phases of development and afterward have them test the entire and developed product at last.
Myth 4: You Should Test Just Before Launch
Some conclude that usability test should happen once a website or application has been produced to discover any usability issues before going live.
However, Testing before launch will either uncover that you’ve outlined a powerful UI or recognize issues that clients will confront, objections that you’ll get, support issues you’ll need to manage, and preparing that will be vital. If you hold up to test until just before release, it’s too late to settle anything besides the most minor issues. You’ll need to settle the huge issues in the next launch.
Myth 5: Usability Testing and User Acceptance testing are similar things
In Usability Testing individuals who are illustrative of the clients take part in the testing procedure. Their testing center exclusively around the client experience and has no bearing what-so-ever on whether the UI meets the business requirements making is completely not quite the same as User Acceptance Testing.
In spite of the way that more individuals think about usability testing and research than any time in recent memory, you may even now experience these myths and misconceptions on projects. A portion of these myths may sound obsolete—like something you haven’t heard in years—and you may think, “Oh, people can’t even now trust that.” But I frequently locate that, exactly when I’ve begun accepting that everybody must hear what I’m saying, another old fantasy or misguided judgment emerges.
Regardless of whether your customers and project colleagues do appear to be educated about types of usability testing, it’s best not to expect that they think about and understand client inquire about techniques. Clarify everything obviously and request inquiries to guarantee that you can keep away from any myths about the usability testing techniques.
We also provide usability testing service and well understand the myths hidden behind the types of usability testing that well assists us providing usability testing best practices to our worldwide clients.