Skip to Content

Blog

Briefing of the Strategies for an Organized QA Procedure

Briefing of the Strategies for an Organized QA Procedure. qa process in software testingQA process in software testing can stay strong, even in lean financial circumstances, when an unmistakable, steady project strategy is set up and automation is utilized sensibly.

While the process of QA testing may appear to be simple, there are many strategies to understand the situation. Communication, Scheduling, Planning. In case you’re not watchful, QA testing process flow and fixing can rapidly turn into reconsideration. Once that happens, issues will escape everyone’s notice, and no one needs that.

Being a software tester is never again pretty much-discovering bugs. It is about continuous change, characterizing an unmistakable software QA process flow, and going that additional mile to enhance quality.

Following a reliable, organized way to deal with QA process in software testing will enable you to obtain more information about the product you are testing, make inquiries you generally might not have thought of, and turn into a true owner of QA process management.

A tester’s part is advancing alongside the adjustment in industry innovation and a move toward an agile strategy. This change opens unexplored, energizing, and challenging opportunities for testers all over the place.

 

So, let’s audit a portion of the key strategies to ensure that your testing QA life cycle process goes off easily.

The Old Way: Just Find Bugs

An initial couple of years as a tester were short on basic reasoning. Each morning the testing team was given a rundown of apps to audit. The appointed resource would introduce the applications and endeavor to break the functionality.

Tester’s execution audits were easy: The more bugs they found, the smarter they were! There was no idea, no technique, and no inspiration. There were talks loaded with the number of bugs all testers discovered as opposed to the quality of those bugs.

That raises so many questions! What value did testers include? Should testers just aimlessly test to discover bugs?

Building up a QA process in software testing:

As a part of the testing functionality, the QA team would likewise investigate, examine the stack follow, and give the main root of the issue to the developer. It was reviving to see everybody work together as one group with a typical reason.

In this manner, the tester was not a minor individual endeavoring to break the tool, however more a cooperative person adding to the overall effort. As the testers turned into various groups, they organized the constant change of automation and inside and out learning about every part. It is the entirely unexpected point of view about QA and a recently discovered regard about what amount included value this part brings.

There is the importance of following a more organized way to deal with QA. With the assistance of the QA architect, thus here are the top techniques for an enhanced QA process and methodologies.

  • Audit Design and Architectural QA process documentation

It’s dependably a smart thought to run in with as much information about the product under test as could reasonably be expected If plan and structural records are accessible, give them a read. You would be stunned by the amount more you understand the product’s architecture, the incorporated components, and the stream of information than you would from testing alone. Take notes and draw a parallel to what you are testing and how the system associates.

  • Research past Defects

The past educates the present. It is vital to know the risk zones and the most helpless functionality that could break your application with each change. That sort of information could originate from the historical backdrop of defects.

Lead some examination of your defect tool and break down past defects revealed. Any anticipated example that left this examination would enable you to grow more automation around those territories. If there are client announced defects, analyze those as well. This activity will enable you to settle on choices about the QA test process for different launches.

  • Triage the Defects

This isn’t only the activity of the engineers. You access the log document, the commits, and the code, so you can do some digging to settle issues. Relying on how technical you will be, you can dive as deep as you prefer. However, in an abnormal state, take a look at the exceptions in the log. Is it an invalid pointer exemption? Does that need to do with particular information or some sequence of QA process steps?

Limit the issue and begin a discussion with the developer. They will value the point by point data and research.

  • Go past the Reported Issue

Don’t simply center on QA process in testing functionality. Consider the back-end and front-end collaborations of your application, as well.

It is fundamental to be of an agile mindset when looking for product holes and the answers for filling them. One key lesson in QA process improvement plan is being proactive rather than receptive. The bugs you reveal may end up being issues or technical stories, yet by having that solution, you have avoided mistakes that may have gone unnoticed or thought of more major issues considerably later.

The standard QA process testing and fixing software can be inconspicuous, precarious, and even political, however, as long as you’re ready to expect and perceive regular issues, you can keep things running easily. The key is to remember that Organized QA process improvement techniques take preparation and planning to run a good QA SDLC process.

The advantages of having an organized software QA process document can rapidly be exceeded by the political idea of discrete divisions organizing distinctive things. A developer wanting to ship and testers needing to be as intensive as would be possible. Monitoring the potential restricting powers and keeping everybody pointed a similar way can go far towards alleviating these potential QA process improvement suggestions.

Since we have very much talented and qualified team of testers that assist our clients with an assured quality product at the time, we are well known among are rivals in software testing industries.

0 Continue Reading →

How to Prioritize Software Testing on Little Time

How to Prioritize Software Testing on Little Time. thorough testingFrequently testers will end up coming up short on time when thorough testing an application. Do you regularly acknowledge you don’t have enough time to test? You had everything under control, regardless, yet soon you are achieving the emergency course of actions “What to do when there isn’t sufficient time to test basics of software testing?”

If we have enough time to test the application then it isn’t an issue by any means. In any case, if there isn’t sufficient time for different types of software testing, in this circumstance it won’t possible to test each and every combination of scenario. One of the significant tasks of a Test Manager is to prioritize which tests should be run when there isn’t sufficient time to execute thorough testing.

Firstly learn, Why does this happen? Numerous reasons – some of which are:

Wrong estimation techniques in software testing:

If you began with a Wrong Estimation, things will undoubtedly fail. Decent test estimation must consider the accompanying:

  • Time for preparatory assignments
  • Test Cases maintenance
  • Ad-hoc/exploratory software testing
  • Detailing/Communication
  • Possibility factor
  • Team and its ability

Unsteady forms and other technical issues like Test data unavailable, Smoke/Sanity test failures, Environment issues and so on.

An absence of understanding between all gatherings included: This may be an uncommon issue with groups following agile software testing or safe because of the nearby circles they work in, however, numerous groups still experience the ill effects of contradiction or miscommunication in the matter of when Dev, Ops, and QA should get expectations from each other.

Since we know the issues, here are some effective methods for software testing to settle it.

Utilize risk analysis to figure out where thorough testing should be engaged.

Since it’s once in a while possible to test each conceivable part of an application, each conceivable combination of events, all reliance, or everything that could turn out badly, risk analysis is appropriate to most software development projects.  This requires judgment abilities, the presence of mind, and experience.

Considerations can include:

  • Which functionality is most imperative to the project’s planned reason?
  • Which functionality is most unmistakable to the client?
  • Which functionality has the biggest security effect?
  • Which functionality has the biggest budgetary effect on clients?
  • Which parts of the application are most vital to the client?
  • Which parts of the application can be tested ahead of early in the development cycle?
  • Which parts of the code are most mind-boggling and in this manner most subject to mistakes?
  • Which parts of the application were created in rush or panic mode?
  • Which parts of comparative/related past tasks caused issues?
  • Which parts of comparative/related past tasks had large maintenance costs?
  • Which parts of the necessities and configuration are hazy or foolish?
  • What do the engineers believe are the highest-risk parts of the application?
  • What sorts of issues would cause the most exceedingly bad attention?
  • What sorts of issues would cause the most client benefit objections?
  • What sorts of tests could without much of a stretch cover various functionalities?
  • Which tests will have the best high-chance scope to time-required proportion?

At long last, in spite of the considerable number of precautions and measures if you still find yourself crunched for time, ask help to your colleagues. We, at TestOrigen, deliver thoroughly tested software product at a time, as we have 50+ software testers working proficiently as well as helping each other providing effective and efficient software testing to our worldwide clients.

0 Continue Reading →

Vodafone & SAP Joined Hands to Boost Industrial IoT in India

Vodafone and SAP Joined Hands to Boost Industrial IoT in India. latest technologyOn Thursday, the enterprise solutions provider SAP and Vodafone multinational company announced a strategic partnership to boost the adoption of latest technology i.e. industrial IoT startups as well develop comprehensive communications solutions for enterprises in India.

The organizations will now use both a SAP “Leonardo” and Vodafone’s “IoT-Managed Connectivity Platform”.

“The offerings gave by Vodafone company in India are genuinely reciprocal to the SAP Leonardo portfolio – our endeavor review offering for the latest technology,” Neeraj Athalye, Head-Innovation and Digital Strategy Group, SAP Indian Subcontinent, said in an announcement.

“SAP Leonardo” is a digital development system that unites the internet of things, machine learning, Blockchain technology and the big data analytics on the SAP Cloud Platform utilizing configuration thinking services.

“We plan to furnish our clients with end to end monitoring and arrangements that will move business values from ‘things to results,'” he included.

The organization will help improve digital reception by undertakings via giving arrangements that use the latest technology including Analytics, Cloud, and internet of things.

Germany-headquartered SAP and Vodafone will offer a large group of innovative packages involving business application software, network arrangement end-to-end gadget administration and support all the latest technology services.

The Nick Gliddon, Director-Vodafone, Enterprise Business also included that “Working as a team with SAP, we offer an end to end association crosswise over IoT and examination which empowers significant understanding and centered results.”

Vodafone today has more than 66 million industrial IoT connections and has been perceived by Gartner as ‘Leader’ in its “Magic Quadrant for Managed M2M Services” for the fourth sequential year.

SAP applications and services empower in excess of 378,000 business and public sector clients.

TestOrigen always gets daily updates of all the latest technology news that make us more confident and provide us a vision to upgrade our software testing services for our clients around the world.

0 Continue Reading →

State Transition Testing: The Part of Black Box Testing Technique

State Transition Testing-The Part of Black Box Testing Technique. state transition testing in software testingState transition testing in software testing is one of the black box testing techniques and is utilized where some part of the system can be depicted in what is known as a “finite state machine”. This basically means that the system can be in a number of various states, and the transitions from one state to another are determined by the guidelines of the “machine”.

It is characterized as the testing strategy in which the tester analyzes the conduct of an application under test for various input conditions in a series. In this state-transition testing, tester gives both positive and negative input test values and record the system conduct.

Or in other words, this state transition testing procedure is utilized when features of a system are spoken to as states which change to another state. The changes are determined by the principles of the software product.

It is the dynamic testing model that has state transition diagram in software testing, State-Event Matrix and test cases as its output. These outputs are triggered by transitions to the input conditions or changes to ‘state’ of the system. Thus, the state transition testing in software testing is intended to execute invalid and valid state transitions.

State Transition Testing Technique is useful where you have to test diverse system transitions.

When to Use state transition testing technique?

  • This can be utilized when a tester is testing the application for a limited arrangement of input values.
  • At the point when the tester is endeavoring to test sequence of events that happen in the application under test. I.e., this will enable testers to test the application conduct for a sequence of input values.
  • At the point when the system under test has a reliance on the events/values previously.

When to Not Rely on State Transition Table in Software Testing?

  • At the point when the testing isn’t improved the sequential input combinations.
  • In the case, testing is to be improved the situation distinctive functionalities like exploratory testing

Four Parts of State Transition Testing in Software Testing:

There are 4 fundamental segments of the State Transition Model as underneath:

  • States that the software product may get
  • Transition starting with one state then onto the next
  • Events that root a transition like shutting a document or withdrawing cash
  • Actions that outcome from a transition

Deriving QA Test Cases:

  • Understand the different state, transition and mark each invalid and valid state.
  • Characterizing a succession of an event that prompts a permitted test finishing state.
  • Every last one of those went to state and traversed transitions should be noted down.
  • Stages 2 and 3 should be repeated until the point when the sum total of what states have been gone too and all transitions traversed.
  • For test cases to have a good scope, real input values and the real output values must be produced.

Since, we at TestOrigen also provides all types of software testing including black-box testing, white box and helping our customers by making their software product bug free all over the world.

0 Continue Reading →

Journey towards Pros & Cons of Working Remotely

Journey towards Pros and Cons of Working Remotely. pros and cons of working remotelyCompanies are evolving, too. After some outstanding organizations that have adopted the remotely working routes, for example, DuckDuckGo, Doist, Buffer, InVision, Zapier and numerous others—began to simply convey the pros and cons of working remotely, including a substantially bigger talent pool and expanded worker engagement and efficiency among others, numerous different organizations have chosen to follow their lead.

With evolving technology no longer a constraining component and organizations progressively thinking about remote workers, it’s possible that the present employment searchers are wondering whether this better way of working makes sense for them.

However, working remotely may be the best gig in the world, yet even the familiar luxuries of home can negatively affect your profitability, and surely not for all job type. You need to have a right team set up, and it takes working remotely tips practices.

What does working remotely mean?

Working remotely is otherwise called “work from anyplace,” as you genuinely can work from wherever on the planet. Frequently, remote workers don’t live close to their bosses and can deliver projects for an assortment of organizations at one time.

 

Additionally, telecommuters may never meet their manager’s eye to eye, particularly if, notwithstanding working remotely every day, they aren’t required to go to onsite meetings or training sessions. At long last, most remote position enable the worker to work on their own time, at whatever point they can fit their agreed upon tasks into their schedule, rather than having set office time.

Since working remotely as a software engineer is adaptable and can be performed from wherever an employee is at a given minute, remote positions are awesome for students, explorers, or the individuals who have another task that takes up the greater part of their day.

There are various pros and cons of working remotely. Let’s explore some of them.

Pros of Working Remotely:

Decreases Commuting Cost and Time

The employees working remotely invest less money and time traveling to the workplace, which saves a lot of cash in the whole deal. This also implies additional time in the day to be beneficial.

Saves money on Office Expense

In case you’re working 100% remote, you’ll save a considerable measure of cash by not leasing or owning an office building.

Greater Productivity

At the point when done right, working remotely can lead to a more engaged workday. Managers fear the diversions of TV and household chores; however, the workplace accompanies meetings, noise, and numerous different disturbances from associates. Numerous individuals work best in their own particular space, with peace and calm.

You Can Hire Anyone

Why restrict yourself to employing individuals inside a specific topographical area? By enlisting remote colleagues, you can locate the best ability to take care of business, regardless of where they’re found.

Expanded Flexibility

It’s nothing unexpected that one of the greatest benefits of working remotely is the expanded flexibility to work wherever you need. This makes it less demanding to juggle work, family, and different commitments. Work-life balance can enhance significantly by working remotely – yet be cautious; without the right limits, the inverse can happen.

24-Hour Support

Ideally, you have clients all around the globe utilizing your product constantly of the day. By enlisting in various time zones, you can give 24-hour client support to guarantee those clients are taken care of regardless of what time it is.

Cons of Working Remotely:

  • Can hold up career versatility.
  • Greater should act self-motivated.
  • Can make one feel less associated with the general association, its central goal, and vision.
  • Reduced social collaboration can prompt sentiments of social and professional isolation.

“The main concern is that many employees who work remotely have is staying ‘noticeable’ inside the association – feeling part of the team and being considered for advancements, raises vital new tasks etc.”

Although there are so many pros and cons of working remotely as it takes practice, commitment, and strong relational abilities. It’s not for everybody, but rather you’d be amazed that we have a number of testers who are working remotely for our clients all over the world with full dedication and loyalty. After all, we are the best independent software testing company providing high-quality services all around the globe.

0 Continue Reading →

Learn JIRA Installation on Linux with TestOrigen

Learn JIRA Installation on Linux with TestOrigen. installing jira on linuxBefore you bounce right in with the installing JIRA on Linux procedure, you should know about JIRA-The famous bug tracking and project management tool which is utilized by various software development projects.

JIRA software testing tool gives various unmistakable favorable circumstances and helps colleagues, project managers, and product owners to deliberately track the procedures of the task.

Yet, keeping in mind the end goal to reap the complete advantage of JIRA, you need to execute JIRA installation and configuration as well as convey it on a server.

In this JIRA Tutorial, we would discuss the installing JIRA on Linux, Additionally to give you start with utilizing JIRA management tool, we would list down the number of steps to make another new project in JIRA open source. Read on and find how.

Requirement: Java software must be installed on your System.

  • Download trial version of JIRA from JIRA TOOL DOWNLOAD

Download trial version of JIRA from JIRA TOOL DOWNLOAD PAGE. installing jira on linux

  • Select System as ‘Linux 64 bit’ and tap on the download button.
  • 64 bit may require more memory instead of 32 bit as it contains more java platform objects.
  • Open Linux console.
  • And then, enter your root Id and afterward enter your password. This is a fundamental requirement for Customize JIRA installation Linux.
  • In the case that your validation is failed then attempt to do again.
  • Enter destination path where you downloaded JIRA.
  • Directory: home/<username>/software/JIRA
  • Run a command as chmod a+x Atlassian-Jira-X.Y.bin (where X.Y refers to your version of JIRA) ex. chmod a+x Atlassian-Jira-software 7.0.5-Jira-7.0.5-x64.bin
  • Presently you are getting the opportunity to message on the console as ‘ Unpacking JRE…’ and ‘Beginning Installer’.
  • Ensure that your Linux System containing the latest version of JRE. Else, it might make an issue to run JIRA.
  • At that point, you can see the INFO as ‘Created user preferences directory.
  • Presently it will make an inquiry as,

This will install JIRA tool free download 7.0.5 on your PC.

Alright [0, Enter], Cancel [c]

  • It shows that in the case that you need to download JIRA on your PC at that point click on the OK button by entering 0 or else C.
  • Subsequently, Enter here 0 for proceeding with tool JIRA installation

Next, it will inquire

Pick the proper installation or update alternative.

Please pick one of the accompanyings:

Express Install [1], Custom Install [2, Enter], Upgrade a current JIRA installation [3]

  • It demonstrates that if you need to install ‘Express’ version of JIRA at that point Enter ‘1’, in the case that you need to download ‘Custom’ version of JIRA at that point Enter ‘2’ If you need to upgrade your JIRA form at that point Enter ‘3’.
  • Therefore, enter ‘2’ here as we need to install Customize JIRA.

Next, it will ask about where you need to install JIRA Linux? At that point enter the directory where you need to install JIRA Linux. Else, it will take default address.

  • At that point, it will request PORT number as a part of the setup.
  • JIRA requires two TCP ports that are not being utilized by some other applications on this machine. The HTTP port is the place you will get to JIRA through your program. The control port is utilized to fire up and shutdown JIRA.

Utilize Default ports (Control 8005, HTTP: 8080) – Recommended [1, Enter],

Set the custom value for Control Port and HTTP [2]

  • It demonstrates that, if you need default port at that point enter ‘1’ on the console and you need to set custom value at that point Enter ‘2’.
  • In the case that you have entered ‘2’ at that point, you have to enter server’s Port number and control port from where you need to get to JIRA.
  • Therefore, Enter ‘2’ and afterward Enter Port number as [9000] and control port number as [9005].
  • You can see below screenshot for more data.

You can see below screenshot for more data. installing jira on linux

 

A while later you will get a message as JIRA can keep running in the background. installing jira on linux

  • A while later, you will get a message as ‘JIRA can keep running in the background.’
  • You may run JIRA as a service, which implies it will begin consequently at whatever point the PC restarts.

Install JIRA as Service?

Truly [y, Enter], No [n]

  • It is inquiring about JIRA service; do you like to begin it when your system is begun? If you need to state Yes enter ‘y’ or else No ‘n’.
  • In this manner, you have to enter here ‘y’.
  • At that point, it shows every one of the insights about JIRA like where it will install and on which port it will work. You can check it in the screenshot.
  • Presently it will request the exit.

Install [I, Enter], Exit [e]

  • Here we can enter ‘e’ for close the console.

Here we can enter e for close the console. installing jira on linux

  • From above screenshot, we can see that installing JIRA on Linux is going to RUN. A short time later, it will keep running on ‘localhost: 9000/’ as we have given port number 9000.

When JIRA is arranged the subsequent stage is set up the new project with the goal that you can welcome colleagues to begin making tickets and utilizing JIRA dashboard. JIRA various convenient features while making a task and assists you to edit and arrange them once it is set up. In JIRA most features are authorization driven which can be changed by the JIRA admin user, which is ideally the team lead.

We, at TestOrigen, also using this JIRA document management tool and are very much handy in using it. So do come to us and get your product tested.

 

0 Continue Reading →

Basic Principles of Software Testing Improving QA

Basic Principles of Software Testing Improving QA. basic principles of software testingAs software development systems have progressed during the last years, some basic principles of software testing have also been set up. These principles of testing in software engineering can be viewed as a fundamental rule for both, Software Testing and coding.

Performing Testing has dependably been an important and challenging assignment. Therefore, to perform testing adequately and productively, different organization lines have been displayed and proposed by researchers already in the field.

Various testing standards have been aggregated over the time of the last few decades by a thorough understanding of the testing psychology.

It is vital to accomplishing maximum test outcomes while performing software testing without deviating from the real objective. This is an expressed certainty, yet how can we be able to really establish that we are following the right methodology for testing???

For that, we have to adhere to some fundamental testing standards as these standards were set up to adjust both, development and software testing. These software testing principles are viewed as a fundamental rule for Testing.

This more likely has encouraged you to find out about them. Isn’t it? So, why wait, let’s learn 7 principles of software testing in brief:

Testing shows presence of defects:

Testing can show the defects are available, yet can’t show that there are no defects. Indeed, even subsequent to testing the application or product completely we can’t state that the product is 100% defect free. Testing dependably decreases the number of unfamiliar defects staying in the product yet regardless of whether no defects are discovered; it isn’t a proof of accuracy.

Exhaustive testing is impossible:

In the case, we discuss this principle; it says it isn’t conceivable to test the whole software. Testing with all combination of data sources and outcomes. Testing with every single conceivable situation isn’t possible. At that point, you should be thinking how we will test the entire software. It’s just plain obvious, rather than performing complete or Exhaustive testing we go for risk-based testing. Recognizing the effect can help us to identify the module which is at high risk.

Try not to contemplate it, as of now it is sufficient for you to know exhaustive testing isn’t possible. Later on, you will come to know, why this principle itself says it impractical.

Early testing:

To discover defects early, testing activities might be begun as early as conceivable in the software product or system advancement life cycle and should be centered on characterized goals. In the case that the testing team is included appropriate from the earliest starting point of the necessary social event and investigation stage they have better understanding and knowledge about the product and also the cost of value will be considerably less if the defects are found as right on time as conceivable as opposed to later in the development lifecycle.

Defect clustering:

Normally, maximum defects in software exist within the restricted arrangement of software zones. Defect Clustering in software testing implies that a small module or functionality contains the vast majority of the bugs or it has the most operational disappointments. Testing attempts should always be centered on the normal and later watched defect density of modules/regions. As a rule, few modules contain the greater part of the defects which as a rule can be in charge of a large portion of the operational disappointment. In some cases, bugs found during pre-discharge are additionally in charge of operational failures.

According to the Pareto standard i.e., 80:20 administer 80% of failures are because of 20% of code! This data can be exceptionally useful while doing testing. In the case that one defect is found in a specific module or territory during testing action at that point there may be high odds of getting substantially more defects there itself.

Pesticide paradox:

If similar sorts of tests are repeated again and again, in the end, a similar arrangement of test cases will never again have the capacity to locate any new bugs. To beat this “pesticide paradox testing principle” came into existence. The pesticide paradox in software testing is extremely imperative to survey the test cases consistently and new or diverse tests should be composed to practice distinctive parts of the software product or framework to possibly discover more defects.

Software testing is context dependent:

As per this principle; if you are testing mobile application and web application utilizing same testing methodology, at that point it isn’t right. This principle says the testing methodology should appear as something else and that is relying upon the application. System for testing web application would be not the same as android mobile application testing.

The absence of errors fallacy:

Because testing didn’t discover any defects in the product, it doesn’t imply that the product is prepared to be delivered. Were the executed tests really intended to get the most imperfections? Or on the other hand where they intended to check whether the product coordinated the client’s necessities? There are numerous different variables to be considered before settling on a choice to deliver the product.

These were the basic principles of software testing. Software testing is an extremely inventive and intellectually difficult assignment.

Picking up software testing principles and practices is much the same as figuring out how to drive out the first time. At first, when we figure out how to drive, we have to focus on every single detail of clutch handling, speed, gear shifts etc. Yet, with time and experience, we simply center on driving and rest falls into place naturally.

A similar thing is additionally valid for these basic principles of software testing. Our Tester with time and experience has consolidated all of these basic principles of software testing to a level that they apply them even without considering.

0 Continue Reading →

Reasons Why Automation will Never Replace Manual Testing

Reasons Why Automation will Never Replace Manual Testing. manual software testingThe software testing automation has received much consideration lately. There are a lot of talks that automation testing is replacing manual software testing. A lot of testers and developers in today’s world want to look for the help of test automation to make their lives simple. Although, automation testing framework does not be able to completely replace manual testing methodologies. Thus, we can’t expect that automation software testing can ever able to replace manual testing out there on the planet.

Some development groups bounce into automated testing like it’s the heavenly vessel. And, it is—somewhat. People think why undergo the cost of manual testing approach when you can simply compose automated tests in their place? It’s quicker, less expensive, and gives the same results as manual software testing… right?

Wrong! In all actuality, the manual testing process hasn’t left. It never will.

As we’re strong believers to manual testing. Indeed, even as automated suites turn out to be more complex, regardless they require human drivers. Actually, automated tests are frequently converted from initially manual efforts.

Here’s the reason why automation won’t ever replace manual testing concepts:

People are imaginative and investigative

While we all at once complaint about the downfalls of being human, for what reason wouldn’t we be able to fly?!  But, we do have our great characteristics.

The abilities and experience that testers convey to the table help them strategize each time they begin another session. As of right now, there’s no substitution for our quick mental preparing speeds and our fool investigation!

Automated tests can contain bugs/defects.

Much the same as your application’s code can contain bugs, automated tests can as well. In the case that you compose automated tests with bugs, you will have false positives. This can prompt real issues for your clients and your group. The human element of manual QA testing can find these mistakes and ensure you’re testing appropriately.

There’s an entire group of testing that basically should be manual

User experience is presumably the main motivation why manual testing is vital. We all could utilize important feedback from time to time. When it comes to functionality as well as to initial introductions, there’s no trade for the human eye.

While smoke tests can be automated, they too are better left for the testing manual. It’s far speedier for a tester to poke around your application and check whether it’s prepared for in-your-face testing than for a tester to compose scripts that would do same. Also, early-stage scripts won’t last, in any case.

Besides, just a human can double check languages utilize and other key localization factors in a product focusing on various regions.

Usability testing can’t be automated.

Automating Usability tests is simply impractical. Usability testing requires a human. You can’t prepare a PC to distinguish “great” usability versus “bad” usability. Maybe you’re considering, “alright, we will simply skip usability testing”. Try not to commit that error. By skipping usability testing, you’re presenting a huge amount of risk. This progression in the QA procedure is vital to guarantee confidence in the release.

Automation is excessively costly for small projects.

Not exclusively do you have testing automation software to pay for, however, you likewise have higher related support and administration costs, because of script written work and reworking, and in addition, set up and handling times.

For long-term software products and projects, the higher expenses can be justified, despite all the trouble. But, for shorter, smaller projects it’s a stupendous misuse of both time and money.

While figuring the potential ROI for a mechanization buy, you need to factor in included worker hours, also.

Therefore, the presence of both automation and manual testing constrains us to consider our selection of the testing tool, their cost, and the advantage they will give. There are a time and place for both manual testing and automation testing strategies for performing software testing. Manual software testing encourages us to understand the whole issue and investigate different points of tests with adaptability. Automation testing helps save time over the long run by achieving an expansive number of surface level tests in a brief span. It’s dependent upon you to decide when and where every strategy for testing is utilized.

Although, automation won’t replace types of manual testing, yet neither will manual software testing remove automation. Once the difference between them is understood, the deep-rooted dread of automation breaks down and a capable, gainful coordinated effort rises.

We, at TestOrigen, provides both QA manual testing as well as Automation using all the latest manual testing tools and automation testing tools, as we are well aware of the difference between automation and manual that making us a leader among various software testing companies.

0 Continue Reading →

Soon IndusInd Bank’s Clients will See Transactions on WhatsApp

Soon IndusInd Banks Clients will See Transactions on WhatsApp. latest news on indusind bankAccording to this latest news on IndusInd bank, its business customers will soon be able to get their transactions directly on the application of WhatsApp messenger.  The IndusInd bank ltd launched a pilot program on Tuesday with apk WhatsApp latest project in India to communicate with its bank customers.

The message benefit on application WhatsApp download is being rolled out to assist customers in stages. Clients can save the official WhatsApp number of the bank and start a conversation, the latest news on IndusInd bank said in an announcement.

The first test phase will enable the bank IndusInd to convey important transaction alerts to attract customers on WhatsApp.

It likewise permits two-way communication with answers for attracting new customers and gives fundamental banking services like checking mini statements, checking balance, checking reward points and in addition updating of Aadhaar through WhatsApp.

As per latest news on IndusInd bank, it is about reaching out to the clients on their favored channel to communicate effectively with them, said Ritesh Raj Saxena, Head Savings, Digital and Payments, IndusInd Bank.

“This expands on our quality ‘on-the-go’ and the benefits of social banking in India. We will work with WhatsApp intently to convey an ever-increasing number of services to our retail and business customers, post this pilot stage,” Saxena said.

The private division lender said it is among one of the principal banks to be a part of WhatsApp pilot.

However before starting any services or launching new software product always need software testing. Thus, get your product tested today by connecting with us, so that you provide full satisfaction to your customers.

0 Continue Reading →

Overview of Recovery Testing in Software Testing

Overview of Recovery Testing in Software Testing. recovery testing in software testingA recovery testing in software testing is the way of evaluating the adequacy of an association’s software product and techniques for recreating information for security and its capacity to dependably recover that information.

It is also called as the backup recovery testing, a fundamental part of a disaster recovery testing strategy. Back up of mission-critical data is mostly considered important in business. In any case, it isn’t unprecedented for testing to reveal issues in software or procedures that could prompt serious data loss.

This recovery testing in software testing forces the software product to fail and checks that disaster recovery testing process is properly performed. The significance of these systems is to such an extent that by their nature they force a strict protocol of how the system should behave in case of a failure.

Every software system is liable to a disaster, and these events can massively affect the business. The recovery testing tools are being prepared with the goal that you can recover rapidly. This is the place disaster recovery testing comes in.

What is recovery testing in software testing?

As the name proposes, recovery testing is the way toward testing the ability of a software product to recover information rapidly in the impacts of system failures, for example, hardware glitches, network blackouts, crashes etc. The recovery testing in software engineering is a type of non functional testing that performed through constrained failing the software product in various ways, and after that check how well the recovery has worked out.

Recovery Plan – Steps:

  • Deciding the utility of the recovery procedure.
  • Confirmation of the backup offices.
  • Guaranteeing appropriate steps are recorded to check the compatibility of backup offices.
  • Giving Training to the team.
  • Showing the capability of the association to recover from all critical failures.
  • Updating and maintaining the recovery plan at regular intervals.

The Importance of Recovery Testing

The capacity to recover from a disaster is critical for any business. How critical your business or product decides the level of criticality for software recovery testing.

For Example, if your software product is a communication platform for the aircraft business being utilized all day, every day and very relied on, the capability to recover in seconds or minutes is vital. On the other hand, if your product is a learning management system, having the ability to recover inside hours or perhaps a couple of days may be adequate.

Mission-critical products with high conditions and strict SLAs must have the capacity to recover rapidly, and consequently, these organizations must contribute the time and money required to lead intensive recovery testing.

Pros and Cons of Recovery Testing in Software Testing:

Pros:

  • Kills dangers: Recovery testing is performed via trained tester or test team so outputs are precise to great extent. It decreases the danger of failure of the product in the market.
  • Enhances System quality: when bugs are found and settled, it enhances the quality of the system.
  • Performance related issues are found and settled before the product goes live available.

Cons:

  • Recovery Testing is a time-consuming activity.
  • Production of back up information of client logs and system history, as well as maintaining, is a repetitive procedure.

The effects of failure are immense. A business can be affected fiscally, their name can be harmed, or a breach of security may occur. These dangers are dependably there, on the grounds that each system is liable to failure, No organization, product, or software is resistant to “breaking”. How constant recoverability is tested specifically impacts how arranged an association is for disaster.

TestOrigen’s Software Testing Services are ideal for this sort of testing. With your requirements in our hand, our well-trained testers can make an intensive recovery test plan and perform it utilizing all conceivable disaster and failure scenarios.

0 Continue Reading →